Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Health Phys ; 121(1): 73-76, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1232236

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This work considers the implications of cloth masks due to the COVID-19 pandemic on suspected plutonium inhalations and dose assessment. In a plutonium inhalation scenario, the greater filtration efficiency for large particles exhibited by cloth masks can reduce early fecal excretion without a corresponding reduction in dose. For plutonium incidents in which cloth masks are worn, urinary excretion should be the preferred method of inferring dose immediately after the inhalation, and fecal excretion should be considered unreliable for up to 10 days.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Feces/chemistry , Inhalation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Masks , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Plutonium/analysis , Radiation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Monitoring , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Plutonium/pharmacokinetics , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Respiratory System/chemistry
2.
Invest Radiol ; 56(3): 135-140, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chest radiography is often used to detect lung involvement in patients with suspected pneumonia. Chest radiography through glass walls of an isolation room is a technique that could be immensely useful in the current COVID-19 pandemic. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to ensure quality and radiation safety while acquiring portable chest radiographs through the glass doors of isolation rooms using an adult anthropomorphic thorax phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen chest radiographs were acquired utilizing different exposure factors without glass, through the smart glass, and through regular glass. Images were scored independently by 2 radiologists for quantum mottle and sharpness of anatomical structures using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistically significant differences in Likert scale scores and entrance surface dose (ESD) between images acquired without glass and through the smart and regular glass were tested. Interreader reliability was also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with conventional radiography, equal or higher mean image quality scores (mottle and anatomical structures) were observed with the smart glass using 100 kVp at 12 mAs and 20 mAs and 125 kVp at 6.3 mAs (100 kVp at 2 mAs and 125 kVp at 3.2 mAs were used for conventional radiography observations). There was no statistically significant difference in the Likert scale scores for image quality and the entrance surface dose for radiographs acquired without glass, through the smart glass, and through regular glass. Backscatter from the smart glass was minimal at a distance of 3 m and was recorded as zero at a distance of 4 m from the x-ray tube outside an isolation room. CONCLUSIONS: Good-quality portable chest radiographs can be obtained safely through the smart glass doors of the isolation room. However, this technique does result in minor backscatter radiation. Modifications in the exposure factors (such as increasing milliampere seconds) may be required to optimize image quality while using this technique.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Patient Isolation/methods , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Adult , Glass , Humans , Pandemics , Phantoms, Imaging , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Radiol Med ; 126(3): 380-387, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-746809

ABSTRACT

This article aims to summarize the available data on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SAR-CoV-2) imaging patterns as well as reducing radiation dose exposure in chest computed tomography (CT) protocols. First, the general aspects of radiation dose in CT and radiation risk are discussed, followed by the effect of changing parameters on image quality. This article attempts to highlight some of the common chest CT signs that radiologists and emergency physicians are likely to encounter. With the increasing trend of using chest CT scans as an imaging tool to diagnose and monitor SAR-CoV-2, we emphasize that pattern recognition is the key, and this pictorial essay should serve as a guide to help establish correct diagnosis coupled with correct scanner parameters to reduce radiation dose without affecting imaging quality in this tragic pandemic the world is facing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL